Two things.
1. I'm one of those people who don't mind leading services for the congregation on occasion, and normally this goes off without a hitch. A couple weeks ago, I lead the evening services in the big 770, and while I was waiting around for people to finish their personal devotional services so that I could commence the Kaddish, I was criticized by several members of the congregation for my speedy rendition of the prayers. I'm not one to respond to criticism of this sort, so I merely shrugged my shoulders and half-smiled. Sensing fresh blood in the water, they pounced, and started telling me how terrible I was (or something like that). Eventually I escaped, and lived to tell the tale.
In my defense, this particular quorum of people had been waiting around for five minutes, and I had declined to lead the prayers several times, on account of my recitation of the daily Ramabm (to head off any advance at the pass, it was the laws of the sanctification of the new moon, and there's no way I'm learning that without a shiur and coffee). Eventually I got fed up (and finished Rambam), and agreed to pray for the assembled masses, to (at the time) great acclaim. Point is, these people wanted me to daven, and it's really not my problem that their own benedictions flowed like molasses in January (admittedly, I davened faster than one would Neilah on Yom Kippur, but still, it's not like I was pulling off a ten minute shacharis [obviously, it was maariv] or something like that). I felt rather put out at the time, but got over it, and am now a better man because of it.
Last night a similar thing happened. There were a number of people waiting for a leader to take them to the promised land, and after I finished up a conversation with an esteemed employee of Chabad.org I volunteered to lead the services. Learning from my previous mistake, I davened nice and slow, allowing everyone to take a couple yawns between paragraphs, and once I had seven or eight people waiting who had finished the silent standing I began "Sanctified and Hallowed be His Name." Soon after, while still saying Joshua's prayer (they always get you when you can't respond, eh?), I was assaulted by a man in black who demanded to know why I had begun Kaddish before I had enough people.
This time I managed to respond, and I told him that where I come from (good 'ol S. Paul), we say the Kaddish prayer when there are six people able to respond. Here there were definitely more. He said something about nine people, but I'll take Rabbi Z's word over his any day. He then launched into a whole thing about "sizing up the situation" which I felt was completely unnecessary, and finally let me go home when I gave him a non-committal grunt. Sheesh.
2. I saw a friend of mine, who recently went off to become a Shliach in southern California, in 770 this morning. I saw another friend of mine (undoubtedly looking for shlichus) and asked him why this other guy was in town. He said, "It used to be that when a guy suddenly appeared in 770 you didn't ask questions...". I answered that this was a very policy, and one which I strongly promoted, but it didn't cover the current situation. I continued that we couldn't even compare this case to that of Los Cabos, because there's no reason to suspect that the hospitals in Los Angeles are in any way inferior to those of New York. In fact, seeing as this person's wife is from Los Angeles, it wouldn't make any sense for them to come to Brooklyn for that reason. So, what's the story?
Wednesday, December 9, 2009
Shmuelie Gourarie, why are you here?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
22 comments:
his niece is getting married tonight in crown heights
Mazal Tov. I appreciate these helpful comments.
Shubshcribing.
What's the case of Los Cabos?
the shliach from los cabos was in crown heights for a while (after the kinus), he had a boy about a week ago
1. You need 6 to daven together to begin Shmone Esrey, you need 9 to answer amen to kaddish (maariv) or chazarah (shacharis/mincha).
2. To leave LA you have to have a good reason
2. Fakert.
Dovid,
That is not mashma from the lashon of the Alter Rebbe's shulchan oruch.
He doesn't say it explicitly but it would seem that his opinion (and thus the halocha) is that the chazara can be done as long as rov minyan can answer.
And obviously kaddish as well. You could argue it's not preferable or that it's better to go lchol daios but for a Lubavitcher there is certainly no chiyuv to wait.
The 770 life...
Oh gosh, only 22 hours left on the poll! I can't bear the pressure!
Alright Menashe I defer to you, I didn't check the SA, just saw thats what we would do.
BUT I don't defer to CA!
Dovid: Au contraire, to stay in LA you need a good reason!
Menashe: Thank you very much.
Sara: Can you handle it?
I would say that kitzur shulchan oruch allows you to say kaddish with even less than six but a) I can't look it up to verify - just going on a shaky memory, and b) the last time I cited shulchan oruch for anything I got screamed at at the TRS table and basically told that Rabbi Shlomo Ganzfried was a moron.
b. The TRS table? I'm honored, but in truth, I'm merely the events coordinator.
A moron?? I said no such thing! Don't take things out of context.
According to rov minyan ubinyan of klal yisroel you need 8 people, that is a minyan counting the leader less one guy who's allowed to be sleeping or davening shmoneh esreh or whatever. THere are also opinions that rov is enough but those are only tp be relied on when you are watching the superbowl and halftime is almost over. Anyone who says you need 9 is either a great scholar who knows more than the chofetz chaim did or an ignoramus who knows a lot less.
Is it possible that the AR and CC disagree on this?
If you want to find me proof that one of OUR poskim hold like that, that's fine. But if OUR Shulchan Oruch says differently from the MB, we are permitted to be machmir but notrequired.
Modeh: He's certainly not the former.
Menashe: Quite possible.
Menashe: you're right if your shulchan aruch says that you need 6, follow it gezunteheit. I'm talking about hte 9
TRS: How do you know?
Agav, it is a saying that a gantz klal yisroel hut nahr eyn shulchan aruch.
Modeh: I have my sources.
B: it's a saying. There are lots of sayings.
I think the intention of the AR was for his SO to be an update of the original SO and to be adopted by gantz klal yisroel. That has not happened. Yet.
Post a Comment